1. A minimalist shoe should be lightweight - in fact, the lighter, the better. My personal rule of thumb is to look for shoes that weigh 10oz or less each, and many of my shoes now weigh in at under 8oz.
2. A minimalist shoe should not have a lot of structure to the upper - a layer of fabric/mesh sufficient to hold it on your foot is all that's needed (the original Nike Free 3.0 is a great example of this).
3. A minimalist shoe should not have a thick, heavily cushioned heel. The best example of this is the Vibram Fivefingers, which have virtually no cushioning in the heel, and no heel-forefoot drop.
4. A minimalist shoe should be as flexible as possible to let the foot move and flex naturally. Again, both the Nike Free 3.0 and Vibram Fivefingers accomplish this well.
A fifth, and more practical rule that I believe in is that a minimalist shoe should never cost more than $100. The word minimalist in and of itself implies less of a shoe, and for that reason I can't understand how any "stripped-down" shoe should cost more than one that is loaded with the supposedly "latest and greatest" shoe technology. Given that many people are interested in trying minimalist running, but are not necessarily ready to shell out the bucks for a pair of shoes that they might not wind up wearing very often, what options are out there?
Saucony Kilkenny 3 spikeless and the Brooks Mach 11 spikeless, and in both cases the heel is very thin. In the Brooks Mach 11 it appears to the naked eye that the heel might actually be slightly thinner than the forefoot, and while walking and running in them I get a distinct sense that my forefoot is being emphasized when it comes to ground contact (it's a difficult sensation to describe unless you try it, it feels similar to the way Newton shoes feel). Where the XC flats don't exactly measure up to my minimalist criteria is in their flexibility - they tend to have a fairly rigid sole (certainly more rigid than the Vibrams or Free's), but hardly moreso than most more typical running shoes.
As with any other more minimalist shoe, you'll probably want to give yourself a break-in period if you decide to try a pair of XC flats. The minimal amount of cushioning is noticeable and can lead to a greater sensation of impact until your stride adjusts, and the low heel means that you'll probably deal with some calf soreness after your first few runs in them. However, if you use caution and common sense, I see no reason why you can't incorporate a cross country racing flat into regular training - in fact, I know of a few runners who use them almost exclusively.
So, if you're looking for a minimalist running shoe and don't want to spend a bundle to try it out, I'd highly recommend giving an XC flat a try - just make sure you get the spikeless version or else you wont be doing much running on asphalt or concrete!.
|SALE: 25% or more off on select running shoes at Amazon.com|
|Save 10% on GPS watches, fitness electronics, and more at Clever Training! Use CODE: RUNBLOGXJT at checkout.|
Shares are like energy gels for bloggers - they power our writing!
We greatly appreciate your support!
You might also like these posts: